P. Legrand, The Impossibility of Legal Transplants and the answer from Alan Watson, 'Legal Transplants and European Private Law, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, pp.111-124, 1997.

G. Teubner, Legal Irritants : Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences', The Modern Law Review, pp.11-20, 1998.

M. Graziadei, Comparative Law and the Study of Transplants and Receptions The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, p.471, 2006.

H. Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State, pp.19-20, 1945.

H. L. and A. Hart, The Concept of Law, Droit et institutions en Grèce antique, pp.92-94, 1961.
DOI : 10.1093/he/9780199644704.001.0001

A. Muhammad-basher, The Administration of Justice in Medieval India, 98 about the influence of the Abbasside institutions, 1941.

F. Werner, H. Menski, and . Law, Beyond Tradition and Modernity Menski criticizes at many times the views of Robert Lingat, Les sources du droit dans le système traditionnel de l'Inde, p.106, 1967.

W. Menski, The Role of Custom in Hindu Law, p.314, 1992.

H. Sumner-maine, D. On-early-law-custom, J. M. London, and D. Mukherjee, A Revisionist Analysis of the Failure of the Widow Remarriage Act 1856', Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Science, shows that only 500 remarriages were acted in Calcutta during the nineteenth century, pp.1-20, 2007.

P. Aggrawal, Customary Law in the Punjab, pp.41-46, 1939.

. Patel, Hindu Women's Property Rights in Rural India, pp.316-317, 2007.

S. Basu and R. Chaudhury, Justice in the Time of Transition. Select Indian Experiences Justice and Law. The Limits of the Deliverables of Law, pp.54-55, 2009.

S. Corbridge and J. Harriss, Reinventing India: Liberalization, Hindu Nationalism and Popular Democracy, p.8, 2000.

G. Forbes, Women in modern India, pp.85-89, 1999.
DOI : 10.1017/CHOL9780521268127

F. Werner, H. Menski, and . Law, Beyond Tradition and Modernity The question of the consent age for sexual intercourse was already answered by the 1891, p.324, 2003.

C. Age and . Act, Through an amendment of the Indian Penal Code, this age was changed from 10 to 12 years. The 1891 Act has provoked a lot of oppositions from orthodox Hindus

K. Das, The Founding Moment Social Justice in the Constitutional Mirror, Justice and Law

. Baxi, The Future of Human Rights The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting and Intent, pp.143-118, 1999.

G. Austin, Working a Democratic Constitution. A History of the Indian Experience, pp.199-201, 1999.

S. Court-of-india and P. , Munichikkanna Reddy & Ors v. Revama and Ors (24/O4/2007) about property law, 2007.

S. Court, A. India, and . Kumar-thakur-v, Union of India & Ors about the reject of the American precedents concerning narrow tailoring of affirmative action measures, 2008.